#Leica m240 how to#
#Leica m240 update#
#Leica m240 upgrade#
#Leica m240 professional#

However, when shooting in JPG, the color palette is strange, with heavy blues, greens, and yellows. Shooting in DNG, the M has an extremely neutral color signature, which makes it fantastic for post processing. The M9-P, Q, and SL all have fairly distinct color renderings, but the M (Typ 240) is strange. Switching between the Leica M9-P, M (Typ 240), Q, and SL, I've found that the Q has my favorite color rendering. However, a number of extra buttons around the body of the camera can be accounted for by changes in technology and added features. The screen is also invaluable when used for Live View, as it is a very easy way to check exposure in a hurry.ДЄll in all, the design of the Leica M (Typ 240) is not far off from previous M models. Even though the M (Typ 240) was released in 2012, a whole five years ago, the screen resolution is still more than adequate during use. Coming from an M8 or M9, this is a huge change that brings the Leica M into the present. There's also a huge, usable screen on the back of the camera body. This problem would be rectified if video recording was activated with a two-step process, or if video recording mode was only accessible via Live View. However, I found that it was a nuisance, and I accidentally triggered video recording unknowingly on a few separate occasions, thinking that the camera was freezing. Ideally, this would mean that the user could quickly take video when needed. ThereвЂ™s a new button at the top of the camera near the power switch, marked вЂMвЂ™ that activates video recording with one click. This is where the M10 would be at a huge advantage in ease of operation. The M240 body also has a bunch of buttons, and trying to operate the camera in the dark is a bit of a challenge. In use, however, the weight difference only becomes obvious in hot conditions, where every ounce wears you down. The M (Typ 240) in comparison to all of the previous M's is much thicker and denser, making it feel much heavier. My personal favorite to handle is the M6, because of how light and thin it is. Most of it obviously comes from the changes in technology between the models, but the slight changes in button layouts and physical heft of the bodies make each body feel unique when holding and shooting with them. Each M, although sharing many aesthetic similarities, has a very distinct feeling to their user experiences. I've used and played with quite a few Leica M cameras in the past few years. So, with the dozens of amazing digital cameras today for under $3,000,В the biggest question is: Is it still worth spending thousands of dollars on an aging Leica M (Typ 240) today? I had far too many SD card and battery issues with the M9-P, to the point that it was a risk to use for any jobs or serious shoots.* *Although it may seem hypocritical that I said all that right above, just to come to the conclusion of upgrading my M-body, I will defend my decision by stating that the M (Typ 240) is infinitely more reliable as a camera than the M9-P.

#Leica m240 upgrade#

Fortunately, I found a great deal on a lightly-used Leica M (Typ 240) to upgrade my M9-P to. Realistically, I found its $6965 MSRP a little discouraging. Now, with the Leica M10 released, I felt a strong temptation to buy the latest M. Soon, I got fed up with Sony's games and sold my entire system to fund a Leica system. With Sony pushing out new camera bodies every half a year or so, I felt desolate that I was always using older, less current gear.

#Leica m240 update#

I also acquired a Sony a7ii to supplement my collection, because I felt the need to always update my gear. I started out with a Sony a7R, and rushed out to buy the Sony a7Rii a year later.

#Leica m240 how to#

Once a photographer knows how to create images in the light available to them, it is not necessary to keep buying the latest camera just to satisfy one's need for technical superiority.Д«ack when I shot primarily with Sony a7-series cameras, I felt the need to upgrade incessantly. Both of these cameras produce beautiful, high-resolution photographs, even though they are not capable of reaching ISOs of 50,000 and above. I am the owner of both a 33-year-old Leica M6 and a 6-year-old Leica M9-P.

In fact, Leica's M-series of rangefinder cameras is a strong testament to this fact.

However, a good camera does not need to be replaced very quickly.

#Leica m240 professional#

Any new consumer or professional DSLR today usually hits the market with a high price, and then depreciates well within the span of a year, as new models are released to replace them. In the digital age of photography, cameras grow obsolete with a pace that approaches urgency.